![]() |
|
|
|
OP
- ED May 3, 2003 Guru roop pyare veero atay bheno, Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh. I may not be with you in person today, but I feel I am in your midst as you celebrate and deliberate on the role of Sikh women in the Panth. I have been on a journey for the last three months on which I never felt alone. I was always aware that you were there, standing shoulder to shoulder with me from the moment Lakhbir Kaur and I resolved not to budge when the sevadars at Darbar Sahib, Amritsar, forcefully stopped us from participating in the Sukhasan Sahib ceremony. Writing down my thoughts is proving to be more challenging than the pace of the Sikh Women and Seva campaign. This is so because much of what has unfolded in the campaign is beyond words. Throughout the campaign, I felt that a force beyond me was operating. This strengthened my resolve, as I was aware that I was not dictating my actions but that the Panth was. It was 10pm on 13 February 2003 and I had checked into Guru Hargobind Nivaas an hour earlier. I had had langgar at the Kaar seva camp site next to Guru Hargobind Nivaas. The langgar was the best thing that had happened that whole day- we were served daal with ghee tarka. I was tired, but I wanted a quiet word with Vaheguru as
things had gone horribly wrong on my journey to Darbar Sahib. I knew not that my day's challenge was not over. When the SGPC sevadar pushed us out of the queue and said " you cant do this seva, you will have to leave ," I felt hurt. But my pain was not from physical force the servadars had used. Instead, I felt that 'my Sikhi' had been hurt. I remembered Sikhi that February night as I closed my eyes and cried tears for my Guru. I felt that Guru Nanak had been betrayed. I had been brought up on Sikhi which preached equality. But what was this Sikhi that was being practiced at Darbar Sahib? I could not stand by and let this go unchecked. I found myself sitting in the outer parkarma of the darbar sahib pondering on the next move, after having been unceremoniously removed form the sukhasan procession by the sevadars. There had been no plans for a campaign. Or so I thought. But I had with me all the tools of a campaign. Two months earlier in London, I had been involved in organizing with VOICES FOR FREEDOM, an interview of the Jathedar of Akal Takht, Joginder Singh. I had carried with me to Amritsar, a VCD of the interview, to present to the Jathedar. One of the 10 questions he was asked in the interview was: Do Sikh women have a right to undertake seva at Darbar Sahib and to participate as one of the panj pyare during amrit sanchar? His answer was : "Sikh women have an unequivocal right to undertake seva at darbar sahib and to participate in the seva of the panj pyare." I had asked him during the pre-interview why then was there talk about Sikh women not being allowed to do seva. I reminded him about the signature campaign started by bhenji Kiran Kaur from Canada. His response to me was: "I have never received a complaint" That cold February night as I sat and stared at the sky above the serene sarovar surrounding the Darbar Sahib, I decided that I had to give the Jathedar his first complaint. The next day we submitted letters of complaints to the Jathedar's and SGPC's offices. We asked for the immediate restoration of Sikh women's right to undertake all forms of seva. That very day, I contacted VOICES FOR FREEDOM to engage the Sikh diaspora in the campaign. VFF started a petition campaign within a week. To date some 300 Sikh organisations around the world are signatories to this petition. For the last three months, our campaign has taken us to villages and cities. We spoke to Sikh women who felt inspired by reminders of Mai Bhago. And we have received tremendous support from Sikh organizations. The voices of dissent have been mere murmurs as no one
has dared to publically denounce Guru Nanak's principle on gender equality.
Yet one knows that this dissent may have influence over the SGPC. This
dissent has in the main been influenced by brahminical attitude towards
sootek and impurity of women. Further, we have not been without difficulties as we struggled to deal with a community with a male bias. There were turning points, days when I went to bed wary of the challenges ahead. At two such turning points the hukumnama the next day was: Slok Mehla 3 The elephant offers its head to the reins, and the anvil
offers itself to the hammer just so, we offer our minds and bodies to
our Guru; we stand before Him, and serve Him.This is how the Gurmukhs
eliminate their self-conceit, and come to rule the whole world. O Nanak,
the Gurmukh understands, when the Lord casts His Glance of Grace. ||1|| Today we await a report by the SGPC's Dharam parchar committee's subcommittee on the way forward. This report is expected by 15 May 2003. At a public meeting called by this subcommittee on 25th april, I submitted :
2. THAT SGPC PUTS IN PLACE SYSTEMS TO ENCOURAGE SIKH WOMEN TO PARTAKE IN THE HITHERTO PROHIBITED SEVA AND THOSE SEVA FOR WHICH THERE IS NO OFFICIAL PROHIBITION, BUT WHICH ARE MONOPOLISED BY SIKH MEN; 3. THAT SGPC ORGANISES A MASS PARTICIPATION BY SIKH WOMEN OF ALL TYPES OF SEVA AT DARBAR SAHIB ON THE APPOINTED DATE, TO MARK THE LIFTING OF THE PROHIBITIONS; 4. THAT SGPC ENGAGES A QUALIFIED PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT TEAM TO ENSURE THAT PROPERLY QUALIFIED STAFF ARE ENGAGED AND TRAINED AS SEVADARS; 5. THAT SGPC ENSURES THAT ONLY THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND AND PRACTISE HUMILITY AND LOVE DURING SEVA SHOULD BE ENGAGED AS SEVADARS; 6. THAT SGPC SETS UP A SECRETARIAT (OVERSEEN BY THE AN INDEPENDENT NON- SGPC COMMITTEE) TO ENSURE THE SMOOTH TRANSITION FROM THE PREVIOUS DISCRIMINATORY TRADITIONS TO THE FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF SIKH WOMEN'S RIGHT TO UNDETAKE ALL TYPES OF SEVA; 7. THAT THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY SEGREGATION OR RESERVATIONS OBSERVED WHEN IMPLEMENTING THESE RIGHTS FOR SIKH WOMEN 8. THAT SGPC SEIZES THIS OPPORTUNITY, TO PUT RIGHT ANY OTHER UNEQUAL TREATMENT OF SIKH WOMEN AT RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS OR OTHER INSTITUTIONS MANAGED BY SGPC. In the short term, we have to ensure that there is an immediate restoration of Sikh women's rights to undertake all forms of seva. We must leave no stone unturned to achieve this and there should be no compromise on this issue. SHATTERING SOME MYTHS ABOUT SIKH WOMEN AND SEVA THAT WERE
PRESENTED TO THE SGPC ALSO ALONGWITH IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT SIKH WOMEN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED
TO PARTICIPATE IN CERTAIN SEVA. WE HAVE REPRODUCED BELOW SOME OF THE MYTHICAL
EXCUSES GIVEN FOR DISALLOWING SEVA AND THE GURMAT RESPONSE TO THESE MYTHS:
a) During seva a Sikh woman would have to endure Eve-teasing,
jostling, or she may indeed be involved in sexual misdemeanours b) A mensturating Sikh women should not be allowed to
do seva and it would be difficult to establish if she is menstruating
when she requests to do seva. c) Sikh men wear their kecchera as an outer garment during
the cleaning seva in Darbar Sahib, however, it would be improper for a
Sikh woman to do the same as it may be distracting for Sikh men. d) Sikh women have never done seva at Darbar Sahib, be
it for cleaning the Darbar Sahib or for doing Kirtan. Why start a new
tradition? Further, they may distract the Surt (spiritual link) of the
male sangat. e) Due to the weight of the Palki Sahib, a woman would
not be able to carry it on her shoulders. f) There is always a heavy rush following the Palki Sahib
seva during the Sukhasan and Parkash ceremonies. If Sikh women are allowed
to undertake the Palki Sahib seva, they could be 'roughed' up in the rush
and could give rise to more problems. TYPES OF SEVA: 1. PALKI The Palki Sahib ceremony is a ritual and no Sikh, man
or woman should do it anyway. 2. PANJ PYARAE Since women were not one of the panj pyarae in 1699, are
Sikh women, therefore, not to take amrit today. Further, since there were
no European Sikhs in 1699, should European Sikhs be disallowed from being
one of the Panj Pyarae too? Using historical events to distort Sikh principles
is a sign of ignorance. The impurity of the mind is greed, and the impurity of the tongue is falsehood. The impurity of the eyes is to gaze upon the beauty of another man's wife, and his wealth. The impurity of the ears is to listen to the slander of others. O Nanak, the mortal's soul goes, bound and gagged to the city of Death. || 2 || FIRST MEHL: All impurity comes from doubt and attachment to duality. Birth and death are subject to the Command of the Lord's Will; through His Will we come and go. Eating and drinking are pure, since the Lord gives nourishment to all. O Nanak, the Gurmukhs, who understand the Lord, are not stained by impurity. || 3 || (page 472 ) The campaign in Panjab, had hitherto not involved the youths because the campaign started during the college examination season. The examinations are coming to an end and Sikh youths have started to approach us to address them at their colleges . We will be addressing the first Sikh youth gathering at Lyallpur Khalsa college in Jallandhar on 10 May. The organizers have promised ANY support the campaign requires to secure full implementation of Sikh women's rights. We will spend the rest of the college holiday season increasing awareness and mustering support amongst Sikh youths. I REMAIN CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISITC ABOUT THE OUTCOME OF OUR CAMPAIGN, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO CALL ON ALL OF YOU TO BE PREPARED TO FIGHT A LONG BATTLE, SHOULD IT BE REQUIRED. Despite the positive response we have received for this campaign, it has flagged up a disquiet in our minds which suggests that long term solutions WILL ALSO HAVE TO COME FROM OUTSIDE PANJAB: FIRSTLY, WHY HAVE EQUAL RIGHTS FOR SIKH WOMEN NOT BEEN PRACTISED AT DARBAR SAHIB DESPITE GURU NANAK'S TEACHINGS ON EQUALITY MORE THAN 500 YEARS AGO? SECONDLY, WHY HAVE SIKH WOMEN MOVED BACK IN TIME? SIKH HISTORY IS FULL OF EXAMPLES OF THE BRAVERY AND CONTRIBUTION OF SIKH WOMEN IN THE PAST? THIRDLY, DESPITE EQUALITY BEING AN ESTABLISHED PRINCIPLE IN SIKHI, WHY HAVE SIKH WOMEN IN PANJAB NOT BEEN VOCAL IN THE PRESENT CAMPAIGN? I hope the other speakers at this seminar will provide detailed answers to these questions. The short answer is that Sikh women in Panjab have long been without these rights and they are hard pressed to help themselves without a helping hand from their brothers and sisters who enjoy these rights elsewhere. The answers to the above questions, suggest that long term solutions lie at the doors of the Sikh diaspora. Not because the Sikh diaspora is superior but because it has the resources. A Sikh is a Sikh wherever he may reside. If he/she serves another Sikh he/she does so in accordance to Sikh principles of sanjivaalta and pyar. I would like to therefore make one proposal: All Sikh organisations in the Sikh diaspora, no matter
what their projects are in their home country, should resolve to undertake
at least one project in Panjab in any village or town and on any social
issue. This project should seek to deal with gender quality by treating
the project with a Gender And Devlopment (GAD) slant. By doing so, it
will seek to develop the capacity of all Sikhs male and female by redressing
the imbalance between genders. What is important is that the role of Sikh
women in any of these projects, whether as provider or recipient, should
be visible. This commentary was prepared for the VFF
seminar "Role and Advocacy of Women in Sikhi, Challenges Ahead and
the Solutions to those challenges in the 21st century" Baltimore,
MD Mejindarpal Kaur is a barraster from the UK. She and Lakhbir Kaur filed complaints with the SGPC and Jathedar Joginder Singh after being denied their right to do sukhasan seva at Darbar Sahib. Mejindarpal continues to work at rallying support for the Sikh women's movement in Punjab and New Delhi. Mejindarpal had originally gone to India to work on human development projects with UNITED SIKHS and FATEH. |